President Trump's February 2026 remarks urging Republicans to nationalize voting in select states triggered immediate constitutional pushback, with officials citing Article I, Section 4's reservation of election administration to the states. Subsequent reports of draft executive orders on voter registration, mail ballots, and counting procedures faced swift legal challenges and bipartisan state resistance, echoing prior court rulings that limited similar federal overreach. Traders assign an 89% probability to No because full nationalization would require either new congressional legislation unlikely to pass or sustained executive action vulnerable to injunctions before the 2026 midterms. While isolated federal initiatives on voter ID or monitoring remain possible, these fall short of comprehensive takeover, sustaining the market's assessment of significant structural barriers.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoTrump vai nacionalizar as eleições?
Trump vai nacionalizar as eleições?
Sim
$15,491 Vol.
$15,491 Vol.
31 dez 2026
Sim
$15,491 Vol.
$15,491 Vol.
31 dez 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
President Trump's February 2026 remarks urging Republicans to nationalize voting in select states triggered immediate constitutional pushback, with officials citing Article I, Section 4's reservation of election administration to the states. Subsequent reports of draft executive orders on voter registration, mail ballots, and counting procedures faced swift legal challenges and bipartisan state resistance, echoing prior court rulings that limited similar federal overreach. Traders assign an 89% probability to No because full nationalization would require either new congressional legislation unlikely to pass or sustained executive action vulnerable to injunctions before the 2026 midterms. While isolated federal initiatives on voter ID or monitoring remain possible, these fall short of comprehensive takeover, sustaining the market's assessment of significant structural barriers.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado Aberto: Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ET
Volume
$15,491Data de Término
31 dez 2026Mercado Aberto
Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
President Trump's February 2026 remarks urging Republicans to nationalize voting in select states triggered immediate constitutional pushback, with officials citing Article I, Section 4's reservation of election administration to the states. Subsequent reports of draft executive orders on voter registration, mail ballots, and counting procedures faced swift legal challenges and bipartisan state resistance, echoing prior court rulings that limited similar federal overreach. Traders assign an 89% probability to No because full nationalization would require either new congressional legislation unlikely to pass or sustained executive action vulnerable to injunctions before the 2026 midterms. While isolated federal initiatives on voter ID or monitoring remain possible, these fall short of comprehensive takeover, sustaining the market's assessment of significant structural barriers.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$15,491Data de Término
31 dez 2026Mercado Aberto
Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's February 2026 remarks urging Republicans to nationalize voting in select states triggered immediate constitutional pushback, with officials citing Article I, Section 4's reservation of election administration to the states. Subsequent reports of draft executive orders on voter registration, mail ballots, and counting procedures faced swift legal challenges and bipartisan state resistance, echoing prior court rulings that limited similar federal overreach. Traders assign an 89% probability to No because full nationalization would require either new congressional legislation unlikely to pass or sustained executive action vulnerable to injunctions before the 2026 midterms. While isolated federal initiatives on voter ID or monitoring remain possible, these fall short of comprehensive takeover, sustaining the market's assessment of significant structural barriers.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions