Moonshot holds near-certain market-implied odds as the third-best AI agent lab by end of August, driven by recent demonstrated agent capabilities, benchmark performance, and competitive positioning against larger labs. Traders appear to view its progress in autonomous task handling and model releases as sufficient to secure that ranking ahead of more established players. This consensus reflects capital-backed sentiment on recent technical milestones rather than guarantees, given the fast-moving nature of AI development. Potential challenges include last-minute releases or capability jumps from labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that could alter relative standings before resolution, or shifts in evaluation criteria for agent quality.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Moonshot 100.0%
Anthropic <1%
OpenAI <1%
Z.ai <1%
$24,482 交易量
$24,482 交易量

Anthropic
No

OpenAI
No

Z.ai
No

SpaceXAI
No

Meta
No

Alibaba
No

No

Moonshot
Yes

DeepSeek
No

Xiaomi
No

MiniMax
No

Nvidia
No

ByteDance
No

Baidu
No

Amazon
No

Mistral
No

Meituan
No

Microsoft
No
Moonshot 100.0%
Anthropic <1%
OpenAI <1%
Z.ai <1%
$24,482 交易量
$24,482 交易量

Anthropic
No

OpenAI
No

Z.ai
No

SpaceXAI
No

Meta
No

Alibaba
No

No

Moonshot
Yes

DeepSeek
No

Xiaomi
No

MiniMax
No

Nvidia
No

ByteDance
No

Baidu
No

Amazon
No

Mistral
No

Meituan
No

Microsoft
No
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Agent Arena" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/agent filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Agent Arena Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Aug 12, 2026, 7:39 PM ET
已提議結果: No
無爭議
最終結果: No
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Agent Arena" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/agent filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Agent Arena Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
已提議結果: No
無爭議
最終結果: No
Moonshot holds near-certain market-implied odds as the third-best AI agent lab by end of August, driven by recent demonstrated agent capabilities, benchmark performance, and competitive positioning against larger labs. Traders appear to view its progress in autonomous task handling and model releases as sufficient to secure that ranking ahead of more established players. This consensus reflects capital-backed sentiment on recent technical milestones rather than guarantees, given the fast-moving nature of AI development. Potential challenges include last-minute releases or capability jumps from labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that could alter relative standings before resolution, or shifts in evaluation criteria for agent quality.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions