The elevated trader consensus against a China-Taiwan military clash before 2027 rests on the absence of major PLA mobilization or large-scale exercises in the Taiwan Strait over the past several weeks, alongside consistent diplomatic engagement between Washington and Beijing. Recent US intelligence assessments have reaffirmed that Chinese leadership lacks a fixed operational timeline for direct confrontation, favoring instead sustained gray-zone pressure through ADIZ incursions and coast guard activity that remain below crisis thresholds. Taiwan’s May legislative approval of additional defense spending and ongoing US arms sales have reinforced deterrence without triggering escalation, while the May Trump-Xi summit highlighted Beijing’s priority on managing cross-strait stability amid broader bilateral talks. These factors sustain the view that coercion short of kinetic conflict remains the prevailing approach through the resolution window.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоДа
$1,789,798 Объем
$1,789,798 Объем
31 дек. 2026 г.
Да
$1,789,798 Объем
$1,789,798 Объем
31 дек. 2026 г.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and Taiwan (Republic of China) between November 11, 2025, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Taiwanese military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) is not.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.The elevated trader consensus against a China-Taiwan military clash before 2027 rests on the absence of major PLA mobilization or large-scale exercises in the Taiwan Strait over the past several weeks, alongside consistent diplomatic engagement between Washington and Beijing. Recent US intelligence assessments have reaffirmed that Chinese leadership lacks a fixed operational timeline for direct confrontation, favoring instead sustained gray-zone pressure through ADIZ incursions and coast guard activity that remain below crisis thresholds. Taiwan’s May legislative approval of additional defense spending and ongoing US arms sales have reinforced deterrence without triggering escalation, while the May Trump-Xi summit highlighted Beijing’s priority on managing cross-strait stability amid broader bilateral talks. These factors sustain the view that coercion short of kinetic conflict remains the prevailing approach through the resolution window.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and Taiwan (Republic of China) between November 11, 2025, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Taiwanese military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) is not.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Taiwanese military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) is not.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Открытие рынка: Nov 13, 2025, 5:55 PM ET
Объем
$1,789,798Дата окончания
31 дек. 2026 г.Открытие рынка
Nov 13, 2025, 5:55 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and Taiwan (Republic of China) between November 11, 2025, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Taiwanese military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) is not.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.The elevated trader consensus against a China-Taiwan military clash before 2027 rests on the absence of major PLA mobilization or large-scale exercises in the Taiwan Strait over the past several weeks, alongside consistent diplomatic engagement between Washington and Beijing. Recent US intelligence assessments have reaffirmed that Chinese leadership lacks a fixed operational timeline for direct confrontation, favoring instead sustained gray-zone pressure through ADIZ incursions and coast guard activity that remain below crisis thresholds. Taiwan’s May legislative approval of additional defense spending and ongoing US arms sales have reinforced deterrence without triggering escalation, while the May Trump-Xi summit highlighted Beijing’s priority on managing cross-strait stability amid broader bilateral talks. These factors sustain the view that coercion short of kinetic conflict remains the prevailing approach through the resolution window.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and Taiwan (Republic of China) between November 11, 2025, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Taiwanese military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) is not.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Taiwanese military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) is not.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Объем
$1,789,798Дата окончания
31 дек. 2026 г.Открытие рынка
Nov 13, 2025, 5:55 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The elevated trader consensus against a China-Taiwan military clash before 2027 rests on the absence of major PLA mobilization or large-scale exercises in the Taiwan Strait over the past several weeks, alongside consistent diplomatic engagement between Washington and Beijing. Recent US intelligence assessments have reaffirmed that Chinese leadership lacks a fixed operational timeline for direct confrontation, favoring instead sustained gray-zone pressure through ADIZ incursions and coast guard activity that remain below crisis thresholds. Taiwan’s May legislative approval of additional defense spending and ongoing US arms sales have reinforced deterrence without triggering escalation, while the May Trump-Xi summit highlighted Beijing’s priority on managing cross-strait stability amid broader bilateral talks. These factors sustain the view that coercion short of kinetic conflict remains the prevailing approach through the resolution window.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы