Ongoing impasse in U.S.-mediated negotiations over territorial control, security guarantees, and Ukrainian sovereignty continues to shape trader views on a full peace agreement by late June. A three-day ceasefire from May 9 to 11, accompanied by a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner exchange, marked the most recent diplomatic step, yet Russian officials immediately described comprehensive talks as paused and a long way off. Ukrainian resistance to ceding regions remains firm while Moscow insists on prior withdrawal from contested areas before deeper discussions. These structural barriers, alongside stalled trilateral meetings and no scheduled breakthroughs before the June 30 cutoff, underpin the strong market consensus reflected in current pricing. A sudden shift in battlefield momentum or direct leader-level concessions could still alter timelines, though such developments remain uncertain.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourOui
$438,432 Vol.
$438,432 Vol.
Oui
$438,432 Vol.
$438,432 Vol.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Marché ouvert : Dec 17, 2025, 5:37 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Ongoing impasse in U.S.-mediated negotiations over territorial control, security guarantees, and Ukrainian sovereignty continues to shape trader views on a full peace agreement by late June. A three-day ceasefire from May 9 to 11, accompanied by a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner exchange, marked the most recent diplomatic step, yet Russian officials immediately described comprehensive talks as paused and a long way off. Ukrainian resistance to ceding regions remains firm while Moscow insists on prior withdrawal from contested areas before deeper discussions. These structural barriers, alongside stalled trilateral meetings and no scheduled breakthroughs before the June 30 cutoff, underpin the strong market consensus reflected in current pricing. A sudden shift in battlefield momentum or direct leader-level concessions could still alter timelines, though such developments remain uncertain.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes