Despite Donald Trump's repeated rhetoric framing Canada as a potential 51st state and occasional references to Alberta's energy resources as a natural U.S. partner, the administration has issued no formal proposals, executive actions, or diplomatic initiatives aimed at acquiring any portion of the province. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's January 2026 comments describing Alberta as independent-minded drew attention, yet State Department officials quickly clarified that meetings with separatist groups were routine civil-society contacts without commitments, and no further sessions occurred. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has remained noncommittal after her 2025 Mar-a-Lago visit, emphasizing provincial sovereignty under the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act while polls show only about 18 percent local support for annexation. With a referendum signature drive still pending and Canadian federal leaders stressing respect for territorial integrity, traders view any concrete U.S. acquisition attempt as improbable absent a major, unforeseen policy shift.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedNEW
NEW
Dec 31, 2026
NEW
NEW
Dec 31, 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Despite Donald Trump's repeated rhetoric framing Canada as a potential 51st state and occasional references to Alberta's energy resources as a natural U.S. partner, the administration has issued no formal proposals, executive actions, or diplomatic initiatives aimed at acquiring any portion of the province. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's January 2026 comments describing Alberta as independent-minded drew attention, yet State Department officials quickly clarified that meetings with separatist groups were routine civil-society contacts without commitments, and no further sessions occurred. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has remained noncommittal after her 2025 Mar-a-Lago visit, emphasizing provincial sovereignty under the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act while polls show only about 18 percent local support for annexation. With a referendum signature drive still pending and Canadian federal leaders stressing respect for territorial integrity, traders view any concrete U.S. acquisition attempt as improbable absent a major, unforeseen policy shift.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Feb 6, 2026, 5:59 PM ET
Volume
$3,215End Date
Dec 31, 2026Market Opened
Feb 6, 2026, 5:59 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Despite Donald Trump's repeated rhetoric framing Canada as a potential 51st state and occasional references to Alberta's energy resources as a natural U.S. partner, the administration has issued no formal proposals, executive actions, or diplomatic initiatives aimed at acquiring any portion of the province. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's January 2026 comments describing Alberta as independent-minded drew attention, yet State Department officials quickly clarified that meetings with separatist groups were routine civil-society contacts without commitments, and no further sessions occurred. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has remained noncommittal after her 2025 Mar-a-Lago visit, emphasizing provincial sovereignty under the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act while polls show only about 18 percent local support for annexation. With a referendum signature drive still pending and Canadian federal leaders stressing respect for territorial integrity, traders view any concrete U.S. acquisition attempt as improbable absent a major, unforeseen policy shift.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volume
$3,215End Date
Dec 31, 2026Market Opened
Feb 6, 2026, 5:59 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Despite Donald Trump's repeated rhetoric framing Canada as a potential 51st state and occasional references to Alberta's energy resources as a natural U.S. partner, the administration has issued no formal proposals, executive actions, or diplomatic initiatives aimed at acquiring any portion of the province. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's January 2026 comments describing Alberta as independent-minded drew attention, yet State Department officials quickly clarified that meetings with separatist groups were routine civil-society contacts without commitments, and no further sessions occurred. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has remained noncommittal after her 2025 Mar-a-Lago visit, emphasizing provincial sovereignty under the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act while polls show only about 18 percent local support for annexation. With a referendum signature drive still pending and Canadian federal leaders stressing respect for territorial integrity, traders view any concrete U.S. acquisition attempt as improbable absent a major, unforeseen policy shift.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions