The Amazonas Senate race for the two seats up in October 2026 remains wide open for second place, with early polling showing Eduardo Braga (MDB) holding a clear lead while Capitão Alberto Neto (PL), Wilson Lima (União Brasil), Plínio Valério (PSDB), and several lower-profile candidates cluster closely behind. Recent candidate registrations and initial surveys from institutes such as Projeta and Veritá highlight this fragmentation, driven by the state's diverse electorate, limited early campaigning, and competition across parties without a dominant frontrunner for the trailing position. The spread in trader pricing reflects uncertainty over turnout patterns, potential alliances, and how national political currents may influence state-level preferences. Further separation could emerge from upcoming debates, additional polling releases, or shifts in voter mobilization among key regional blocs before the single-round vote.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于卡皮唐·阿尔贝托·内托 44%
戴尔森·科雷亚 44%
伊斯梅尔·蒙杜鲁库 44%
普利尼奥·瓦莱里奥 44%

卡皮唐·阿尔贝托·内托
44%

戴尔森·科雷亚
44%

伊斯梅尔·蒙杜鲁库
44%

普利尼奥·瓦莱里奥
44%

教授埃瓦尼
44%

威尔逊·利马
44%

爱德华多·布拉加
44%

埃万德罗·德·奥利维拉
44%

Xuxa do Amazonas
44%
卡皮唐·阿尔贝托·内托 44%
戴尔森·科雷亚 44%
伊斯梅尔·蒙杜鲁库 44%
普利尼奥·瓦莱里奥 44%

卡皮唐·阿尔贝托·内托
44%

戴尔森·科雷亚
44%

伊斯梅尔·蒙杜鲁库
44%

普利尼奥·瓦莱里奥
44%

教授埃瓦尼
44%

威尔逊·利马
44%

爱德华多·布拉加
44%

埃万德罗·德·奥利维拉
44%

Xuxa do Amazonas
44%
This market will resolve according to the candidate who wins the second-most valid votes of any candidate at the specified election.
Candidates will be primarily ranked by order of valid votes won. If two or more candidates are tied for any position, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the candidates’ listed full names as they appear in this market. This market will resolve to the candidate that occupies the second-highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
If the result of this election isn't definitively known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "Other".
This market will resolve based on the result of the election, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the Brazilian government, specifically the Superior Electoral Court (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, TSE) (e.g., www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/resultados-eleicoes).
市场开放时间: Aug 17, 2026, 5:52 AM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the candidate who wins the second-most valid votes of any candidate at the specified election.
Candidates will be primarily ranked by order of valid votes won. If two or more candidates are tied for any position, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the candidates’ listed full names as they appear in this market. This market will resolve to the candidate that occupies the second-highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
If the result of this election isn't definitively known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "Other".
This market will resolve based on the result of the election, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the Brazilian government, specifically the Superior Electoral Court (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, TSE) (e.g., www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/resultados-eleicoes).
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...The Amazonas Senate race for the two seats up in October 2026 remains wide open for second place, with early polling showing Eduardo Braga (MDB) holding a clear lead while Capitão Alberto Neto (PL), Wilson Lima (União Brasil), Plínio Valério (PSDB), and several lower-profile candidates cluster closely behind. Recent candidate registrations and initial surveys from institutes such as Projeta and Veritá highlight this fragmentation, driven by the state's diverse electorate, limited early campaigning, and competition across parties without a dominant frontrunner for the trailing position. The spread in trader pricing reflects uncertainty over turnout patterns, potential alliances, and how national political currents may influence state-level preferences. Further separation could emerge from upcoming debates, additional polling releases, or shifts in voter mobilization among key regional blocs before the single-round vote.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于


警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题