The Amazonas Senate race for the two seats up in October 2026 remains wide open for second place, with early polling showing Eduardo Braga (MDB) holding a clear lead while Capitão Alberto Neto (PL), Wilson Lima (União Brasil), Plínio Valério (PSDB), and several lower-profile candidates cluster closely behind. Recent candidate registrations and initial surveys from institutes such as Projeta and Veritá highlight this fragmentation, driven by the state's diverse electorate, limited early campaigning, and competition across parties without a dominant frontrunner for the trailing position. The spread in trader pricing reflects uncertainty over turnout patterns, potential alliances, and how national political currents may influence state-level preferences. Further separation could emerge from upcoming debates, additional polling releases, or shifts in voter mobilization among key regional blocs before the single-round vote.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日カピタオン・アルベルト・ネト 44%
ダイウソン・コレア 44%
イスマエル・ムンドゥルク 44%
プリニオ・ヴァレリオ 44%

カピタオン・アルベルト・ネト
44%

ダイウソン・コレア
44%

イスマエル・ムンドゥルク
44%

プリニオ・ヴァレリオ
44%

プロフェソラ・エヴァニー
44%

ウィルソン・リマ
44%

エドゥアルド・ブラガ
44%

エヴァンドロ・デ・オリヴェイラ
44%

シュシャ・ド・アマゾナス
44%
カピタオン・アルベルト・ネト 44%
ダイウソン・コレア 44%
イスマエル・ムンドゥルク 44%
プリニオ・ヴァレリオ 44%

カピタオン・アルベルト・ネト
44%

ダイウソン・コレア
44%

イスマエル・ムンドゥルク
44%

プリニオ・ヴァレリオ
44%

プロフェソラ・エヴァニー
44%

ウィルソン・リマ
44%

エドゥアルド・ブラガ
44%

エヴァンドロ・デ・オリヴェイラ
44%

シュシャ・ド・アマゾナス
44%
This market will resolve according to the candidate who wins the second-most valid votes of any candidate at the specified election.
Candidates will be primarily ranked by order of valid votes won. If two or more candidates are tied for any position, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the candidates’ listed full names as they appear in this market. This market will resolve to the candidate that occupies the second-highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
If the result of this election isn't definitively known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "Other".
This market will resolve based on the result of the election, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the Brazilian government, specifically the Superior Electoral Court (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, TSE) (e.g., www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/resultados-eleicoes).
マーケット開始日: Aug 17, 2026, 5:52 AM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the candidate who wins the second-most valid votes of any candidate at the specified election.
Candidates will be primarily ranked by order of valid votes won. If two or more candidates are tied for any position, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the candidates’ listed full names as they appear in this market. This market will resolve to the candidate that occupies the second-highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
If the result of this election isn't definitively known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "Other".
This market will resolve based on the result of the election, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the Brazilian government, specifically the Superior Electoral Court (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, TSE) (e.g., www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/resultados-eleicoes).
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...The Amazonas Senate race for the two seats up in October 2026 remains wide open for second place, with early polling showing Eduardo Braga (MDB) holding a clear lead while Capitão Alberto Neto (PL), Wilson Lima (União Brasil), Plínio Valério (PSDB), and several lower-profile candidates cluster closely behind. Recent candidate registrations and initial surveys from institutes such as Projeta and Veritá highlight this fragmentation, driven by the state's diverse electorate, limited early campaigning, and competition across parties without a dominant frontrunner for the trailing position. The spread in trader pricing reflects uncertainty over turnout patterns, potential alliances, and how national political currents may influence state-level preferences. Further separation could emerge from upcoming debates, additional polling releases, or shifts in voter mobilization among key regional blocs before the single-round vote.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日


外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問